Basic And Clinical Science Course 2014 Pdf
File Name: basic and clinical science course 2014 .zip
- Student Questionnaire to Evaluate Basic Medical Science Teaching (METEQ-B)
- Medical Laboratory Technology Books Pdf Free
- Medical laboratory scientist
Student Questionnaire to Evaluate Basic Medical Science Teaching (METEQ-B)
The World Medical Association WMA has developed the Declaration of Helsinki as a statement of ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects, including research on identifiable human material and data. The Declaration is intended to be read as a whole and each of its constituent paragraphs should be applied with consideration of all other relevant paragraphs. Consistent with the mandate of the WMA, the Declaration is addressed primarily to physicians.
The WMA encourages others who are involved in medical research involving human subjects to adopt these principles. It is the duty of the physician to promote and safeguard the health, well-being and rights of patients, including those who are involved in medical research.
Medical progress is based on research that ultimately must include studies involving human subjects. The primary purpose of medical research involving human subjects is to understand the causes, development and effects of diseases and improve preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic interventions methods, procedures and treatments. Even the best proven interventions must be evaluated continually through research for their safety, effectiveness, efficiency, accessibility and quality.
Medical research is subject to ethical standards that promote and ensure respect for all human subjects and protect their health and rights. While the primary purpose of medical research is to generate new knowledge, this goal can never take precedence over the rights and interests of individual research subjects.
It is the duty of physicians who are involved in medical research to protect the life, health, dignity, integrity, right to self-determination, privacy, and confidentiality of personal information of research subjects.
The responsibility for the protection of research subjects must always rest with the physician or other health care professionals and never with the research subjects, even though they have given consent. Physicians must consider the ethical, legal and regulatory norms and standards for research involving human subjects in their own countries as well as applicable international norms and standards. No national or international ethical, legal or regulatory requirement should reduce or eliminate any of the protections for research subjects set forth in this Declaration.
Medical research should be conducted in a manner that minimises possible harm to the environment. Medical research involving human subjects must be conducted only by individuals with the appropriate ethics and scientific education, training and qualifications. Research on patients or healthy volunteers requires the supervision of a competent and appropriately qualified physician or other health care professional. Groups that are underrepresented in medical research should be provided appropriate access to participation in research.
Physicians who combine medical research with medical care should involve their patients in research only to the extent that this is justified by its potential preventive, diagnostic or therapeutic value and if the physician has good reason to believe that participation in the research study will not adversely affect the health of the patients who serve as research subjects.
Appropriate compensation and treatment for subjects who are harmed as a result of participating in research must be ensured. In medical practice and in medical research, most interventions involve risks and burdens. Medical research involving human subjects may only be conducted if the importance of the objective outweighs the risks and burdens to the research subjects.
All medical research involving human subjects must be preceded by careful assessment of predictable risks and burdens to the individuals and groups involved in the research in comparison with foreseeable benefits to them and to other individuals or groups affected by the condition under investigation.
Measures to minimise the risks must be implemented. The risks must be continuously monitored, assessed and documented by the researcher. Physicians may not be involved in a research study involving human subjects unless they are confident that the risks have been adequately assessed and can be satisfactorily managed. When the risks are found to outweigh the potential benefits or when there is conclusive proof of definitive outcomes, physicians must assess whether to continue, modify or immediately stop the study.
Some groups and individuals are particularly vulnerable and may have an increased likelihood of being wronged or of incurring additional harm.
Medical research with a vulnerable group is only justified if the research is responsive to the health needs or priorities of this group and the research cannot be carried out in a non-vulnerable group. In addition, this group should stand to benefit from the knowledge, practices or interventions that result from the research. Medical research involving human subjects must conform to generally accepted scientific principles, be based on a thorough knowledge of the scientific literature, other relevant sources of information, and adequate laboratory and, as appropriate, animal experimentation.
The welfare of animals used for research must be respected. The design and performance of each research study involving human subjects must be clearly described and justified in a research protocol. The protocol should contain a statement of the ethical considerations involved and should indicate how the principles in this Declaration have been addressed.
In clinical trials, the protocol must also describe appropriate arrangements for post-trial provisions. The research protocol must be submitted for consideration, comment, guidance and approval to the concerned research ethics committee before the study begins. This committee must be transparent in its functioning, must be independent of the researcher, the sponsor and any other undue influence and must be duly qualified. It must take into consideration the laws and regulations of the country or countries in which the research is to be performed as well as applicable international norms and standards but these must not be allowed to reduce or eliminate any of the protections for research subjects set forth in this Declaration.
The committee must have the right to monitor ongoing studies. The researcher must provide monitoring information to the committee, especially information about any serious adverse events.
No amendment to the protocol may be made without consideration and approval by the committee. Every precaution must be taken to protect the privacy of research subjects and the confidentiality of their personal information. Participation by individuals capable of giving informed consent as subjects in medical research must be voluntary.
Although it may be appropriate to consult family members or community leaders, no individual capable of giving informed consent may be enrolled in a research study unless he or she freely agrees.
In medical research involving human subjects capable of giving informed consent, each potential subject must be adequately informed of the aims, methods, sources of funding, any possible conflicts of interest, institutional affiliations of the researcher, the anticipated benefits and potential risks of the study and the discomfort it may entail, post-study provisions and any other relevant aspects of the study.
The potential subject must be informed of the right to refuse to participate in the study or to withdraw consent to participate at any time without reprisal. Special attention should be given to the specific information needs of individual potential subjects as well as to the methods used to deliver the information. If the consent cannot be expressed in writing, the non-written consent must be formally documented and witnessed.
All medical research subjects should be given the option of being informed about the general outcome and results of the study. When seeking informed consent for participation in a research study the physician must be particularly cautious if the potential subject is in a dependent relationship with the physician or may consent under duress.
In such situations the informed consent must be sought by an appropriately qualified individual who is completely independent of this relationship. For a potential research subject who is incapable of giving informed consent, the physician must seek informed consent from the legally authorised representative.
These individuals must not be included in a research study that has no likelihood of benefit for them unless it is intended to promote the health of the group represented by the potential subject, the research cannot instead be performed with persons capable of providing informed consent, and the research entails only minimal risk and minimal burden.
When a potential research subject who is deemed incapable of giving informed consent is able to give assent to decisions about participation in research, the physician must seek that assent in addition to the consent of the legally authorised representative.
In such circumstances the physician must seek informed consent from the legally authorised representative. If no such representative is available and if the research cannot be delayed, the study may proceed without informed consent provided that the specific reasons for involving subjects with a condition that renders them unable to give informed consent have been stated in the research protocol and the study has been approved by a research ethics committee.
Consent to remain in the research must be obtained as soon as possible from the subject or a legally authorised representative. The physician must fully inform the patient which aspects of their care are related to the research.
There may be exceptional situations where consent would be impossible or impracticable to obtain for such research. In such situations the research may be done only after consideration and approval of a research ethics committee. The benefits, risks, burdens and effectiveness of a new intervention must be tested against those of the best proven intervention s , except in the following circumstances:.
Where for compelling and scientifically sound methodological reasons the use of any intervention less effective than the best proven one, the use of placebo, or no intervention is necessary to determine the efficacy or safety of an intervention.
In advance of a clinical trial, sponsors, researchers and host country governments should make provisions for post-trial access for all participants who still need an intervention identified as beneficial in the trial. This information must also be disclosed to participants during the informed consent process. Every research study involving human subjects must be registered in a publicly accessible database before recruitment of the first subject.
Researchers, authors, sponsors, editors and publishers all have ethical obligations with regard to the publication and dissemination of the results of research. Researchers have a duty to make publicly available the results of their research on human subjects and are accountable for the completeness and accuracy of their reports.
All parties should adhere to accepted guidelines for ethical reporting. Negative and inconclusive as well as positive results must be published or otherwise made publicly available. Sources of funding, institutional affiliations and conflicts of interest must be declared in the publication. Reports of research not in accordance with the principles of this Declaration should not be accepted for publication.
This intervention should subsequently be made the object of research, designed to evaluate its safety and efficacy. In all cases, new information must be recorded and, where appropriate, made publicly available. General Principles 3. Risks, Burdens and Benefits Vulnerable Groups and Individuals All vulnerable groups and individuals should receive specifically considered protection. Scientific Requirements and Research Protocols Research Ethics Committees Privacy and C onfidentiality Informed Consent Use of Placebo The benefits, risks, burdens and effectiveness of a new intervention must be tested against those of the best proven intervention s , except in the following circumstances: Where no proven intervention exists, the use of placebo, or no intervention, is acceptable; or Where for compelling and scientifically sound methodological reasons the use of any intervention less effective than the best proven one, the use of placebo, or no intervention is necessary to determine the efficacy or safety of an intervention and the patients who receive any intervention less effective than the best proven one, placebo, or no intervention will not be subject to additional risks of serious or irreversible harm as a result of not receiving the best proven intervention.
Extreme care must be taken to avoid abuse of this option. Post-Trial Provisions Research Registration and Publication and Dissemination of Results Unproven Interventions in Clinical Practice Policy Types Declaration.
Medical Laboratory Technology Books Pdf Free
A medical laboratory scientist MLS , also traditionally referred to as a clinical laboratory scientist CLS , or medical technologist MT , is a Medical professional who performs chemical , hematological , immunologic , histopathological , cytopathological , microscopic , and bacteriological diagnostic analyses on body fluids such as blood , urine , sputum , stool , cerebrospinal fluid CSF , peritoneal fluid , pericardial fluid , and synovial fluid , as well as other specimens. Medical laboratory scientists work in clinical laboratories at hospitals , reference labs, biotechnology labs and non-clinical industrial labs. Those that work in non clinical industrial labs are often referred to as biomedical laboratory technologist BLT in parts of the world. Medical laboratory scientists work in all areas of the clinical laboratory, including blood banking, chemistry, hematology, immunology, histology and microbiology. They are also responsible for confirming the accuracy of test results, and reporting laboratory findings to pathologists and other physicians.
Skip to search form Skip to main content You are currently offline. Some features of the site may not work correctly. Valle and Isabel L. Alaminos and E. Contreras and Luz Elena Salas and P.
Medical laboratory scientist
Yeah, reviewing a books medadm human anatomy structure and function custom edition for the university of michigan medical school lecture notes objectives and power point slides could amass your near links listings. All Medical Subjects. Hence, the importance of knowing their prevalence among our large population of people under school age in Nigeria for the purpose of planning and. If students have the time, they might as well go read a reference textbook.
Welcome to SZABMU
Provides the essential scientific grounding for cu… More. Want to Read. Shelving menu. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Rate it:.
First-year ophthalmology residents are encouraged to complete the 13 volume BCSC series in preparation for the OKAP examination while balancing a steep clinical learning curve and substantial call schedule. By calculating the daily time commitment necessary to read each volume in the series, we hope to help residents create a realistic study plan to compete the entire BSCS series before the OKAP examination. We include all text sections and legends, and we exclude all figures and tables. We calculate the time per day of dedicated reading required to complete a goal number of BCSC books between the start of ophthalmology residency postgraduate year 2 [PGY2] and the OKAP examination by developing a formula that is a function of self-assessed reading speed. If studying is initiated at the beginning of intern PGY1 year, the resident must read for We introduce a formula and provide a table to guide residents on the amount of time needed to dedicate to reading the BCSC each day as a function of self-assessed reading speed.
The Clinical Science Program in Psychological Sciences at Vanderbilt University subscribes to the clinical scientist model of training, with the primary goal of training clinical scientists. All students complete a core set of required coursework, research, and clinical training. This includes courses in the biological, social, cognitive, and affective bases of behavior; human development; individual differences; research design and statistics; psychopathology; psychological assessment; psychological intervention; and professional ethics. Students can focus their training in the following areas:. We typically receive from over applications each year to our program.
It is one of the best places for learning with beds, daily outpatient attendance and 47 operation theatres running daily. It caters to undergradtuate students, post graduate and post doctoral students per year being trained by faculty members and resident doctors. The college made a very humble beginning in with the erstwhile Irwin hospital now the Lok Nayak Hospital attached While keeping pace with this abundance of knowledge is a challenge, the greater challenge is to make this available for benefit of our patients especially in regions of the world where access and affordability to health care are major hurdles.