Universal Law Natural Science And Living Philosophy Pdf Papers
File Name: universal law natural science and living philosophy papers.zip
- Kant’s Prolegomena and Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science.
- Natural rights and legal rights
- The Natural Law: A Study in Legal and Social History and Philosophy
The touchstone of the value of philosophy as a world-view and methodology is the degree to which it is interconnected with life. This interconnection may be both direct and indirect, through the whole system of culture, through science, art, morality, religion, law, and politics. As a special form of social consciousness, constantly interacting with all its other forms, philosophy is their general theoretical substantiation and interpretation.
Kant’s Prolegomena and Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science.
Natural rights and legal rights are the two basic types of rights. Natural law first appeared in ancient Greek philosophy ,  and was referred to by Roman philosopher Cicero. It was subsequently alluded to in the Bible ,  and then developed in the Middle Ages by Catholic philosophers such as Albert the Great and his pupil Thomas Aquinas.
During the Age of Enlightenment , the concept of natural laws was used to challenge the divine right of kings , and became an alternative justification for the establishment of a social contract , positive law , and government — and thus legal rights — in the form of classical republicanism. Conversely, the concept of natural rights is used by others to challenge the legitimacy of all such establishments. The idea of human rights derives from theories of natural rights. The United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights is an important legal instrument enshrining one conception of natural rights into international soft law.
Natural rights were traditionally viewed as exclusively negative rights ,  whereas human rights also comprise positive rights.
The idea that certain rights are natural or inalienable also has a history dating back at least to the Stoics of late Antiquity , through Catholic law of the early Middle Ages ,  and descending through the Protestant Reformation and the Age of Enlightenment to today. The existence of natural rights has been asserted by different individuals on different premises, such as a priori philosophical reasoning or religious principles. For example, Immanuel Kant claimed to derive natural rights through reason alone.
The United States Declaration of Independence, meanwhile, is based upon the " self-evident " truth that "all men are … endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights". Likewise, different philosophers and statesmen have designed different lists of what they believe to be natural rights; almost all include the right to life and liberty as the two highest priorities. Hart argued that if there are any rights at all, there must be the right to liberty, for all the others would depend upon this.
However, despite Locke's influential defense of the right of revolution , Thomas Jefferson substituted " pursuit of happiness " in place of "property" in the United States Declaration of Independence.
The Zoroastrian religion taught Iranians that citizens have an inalienable right to enlightened leadership and that the duty of subjects is not simply to obey wise kings but also to rise up against those who are wicked. Leaders are seen as representative of God on earth, but they deserve allegiance only as long as they have farr , a kind of divine blessing that they must earn by moral behavior.
The 40 Principal Doctrines of the Epicureans taught that "in order to obtain protection from other men, any means for attaining this end is a natural good" PD 6. They believed in a contractarian ethics where mortals agree to not harm or be harmed, and the rules that govern their agreements are not absolute PD 33 , but must change with circumstances PD The Epicurean doctrines imply that humans in their natural state enjoy personal sovereignty and that they must consent to the laws that govern them, and that this consent and the laws can be revisited periodically when circumstances change.
The Stoics held that no one was a slave by nature; slavery was an external condition juxtaposed to the internal freedom of the soul sui juris.
Seneca the Younger wrote:. It is a mistake to imagine that slavery pervades a man's whole being; the better part of him is exempt from it: the body indeed is subjected and in the power of a master, but the mind is independent, and indeed is so free and wild, that it cannot be restrained even by this prison of the body, wherein it is confined. Of fundamental importance to the development of the idea of natural rights was the emergence of the idea of natural human equality. As the historian A.
Carlyle notes: "There is no change in political theory so startling in its completeness as the change from the theory of Aristotle to the later philosophical view represented by Cicero and Seneca We think that this cannot be better exemplified than with regard to the theory of the equality of human nature.
McIlwain likewise observes that "the idea of the equality of men is the profoundest contribution of the Stoics to political thought" and that "its greatest influence is in the changed conception of law that in part resulted from it. One of the first Western thinkers to develop the contemporary idea of natural rights was French theologian Jean Gerson , whose treatise De Vita Spirituali Animae is considered one of the first attempts to develop what would come to be called modern natural rights theory.
Centuries later, the Stoic doctrine that the "inner part cannot be delivered into bondage"  re-emerged in the Reformation doctrine of liberty of conscience. Martin Luther wrote:. Furthermore, every man is responsible for his own faith, and he must see it for himself that he believes rightly.
As little as another can go to hell or heaven for me, so little can he believe or disbelieve for me; and as little as he can open or shut heaven or hell for me, so little can he drive me to faith or unbelief. Since, then, belief or unbelief is a matter of every one's conscience, and since this is no lessening of the secular power, the latter should be content and attend to its own affairs and permit men to believe one thing or another, as they are able and willing, and constrain no one by force.
Preservation of the natural rights to life, liberty, and property was claimed as justification for the rebellion of the American colonies. As George Mason stated in his draft for the Virginia Declaration of Rights , "all men are born equally free," and hold "certain inherent natural rights, of which they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity. The distinction between alienable and unalienable rights was introduced by Francis Hutcheson. Unalienable Rights are essential Limitations in all Governments.
One could not in fact give up the capacity for private judgment e. The right of private judgment is therefore unalienable. In the German Enlightenment , Hegel gave a highly developed treatment of this inalienability argument. Like Hutcheson, Hegel based the theory of inalienable rights on the de facto inalienability of those aspects of personhood that distinguish persons from things.
A thing, like a piece of property, can in fact be transferred from one person to another. According to Hegel, the same would not apply to those aspects that make one a person:. The right to what is in essence inalienable is imprescriptible, since the act whereby I take possession of my personality, of my substantive essence, and make myself a responsible being, capable of possessing rights and with a moral and religious life, takes away from these characteristics of mine just that externality which alone made them capable of passing into the possession of someone else.
When I have thus annulled their externality, I cannot lose them through lapse of time or from any other reason drawn from my prior consent or willingness to alienate them. In discussion of social contract theory, "inalienable rights" were said to be those rights that could not be surrendered by citizens to the sovereign. Such rights were thought to be natural rights , independent of positive law. Some social contract theorists reasoned, however, that in the natural state only the strongest could benefit from their rights.
Thus, people form an implicit social contract , ceding their natural rights to the authority to protect the people from abuse, and living henceforth under the legal rights of that authority.
Many historical apologies for slavery and illiberal government were based on explicit or implicit voluntary contracts to alienate any "natural rights" to freedom and self-determination. Any contract that tried to legally alienate such a right would be inherently invalid.
Similarly, the argument was used by the democratic movement to argue against any explicit or implied social contracts of subjection pactum subjectionis by which a people would supposedly alienate their right of self-government to a sovereign as, for example, in Leviathan by Thomas Hobbes.
According to Ernst Cassirer ,. There is, at least, one right that cannot be ceded or abandoned: the right to personality They charged the great logician [Hobbes] with a contradiction in terms. If a man could give up his personality he would cease being a moral being. For by such an act of renunciation he would give up that very character which constitutes his nature and essence: he would lose his humanity.
These themes converged in the debate about American independence. While Jefferson was writing the Declaration of Independence, Welsh nonconformist Richard Price sided with the colonist's claim that King George III was "attempting to rob them of that liberty to which every member of society and all civil communities have a natural and unalienable title.
Neither can any state acquire such an authority over other states in virtue of any compacts or cessions. This is a case in which compacts are not binding. Civil liberty is, in this respect, on the same footing with religious liberty. As no people can lawfully surrender their religious liberty by giving up their right of judging for themselves in religion, or by allowing any human beings to prescribe to them what faith they shall embrace, or what mode of worship they shall practise, so neither can any civil societies lawfully surrender their civil liberty by giving up to any extraneous jurisdiction their power of legislating for themselves and disposing their property.
Price raised a furor of opposition so in he wrote another tract that clarified his position and again restated the de facto basis for the argument that the "liberty of men as agents is that power of self-determination which all agents, as such, possess. Then it turned out to make considerable difference whether one said slavery was wrong because every man has a natural right to the possession of his own body, or because every man has a natural right freely to determine his own destiny.
The first kind of right was alienable: thus Locke neatly derived slavery from capture in war, whereby a man forfeited his labor to the conqueror who might lawfully have killed him; and thus Dred Scott was judged permanently to have given up his freedom. But the second kind of right, what Price called "that power of self-determination which all agents, as such, possess," was inalienable as long man remained man.
Like the mind's quest for religious truth from which it was derived, self-determination was not a claim to ownership which might be both acquired and surrendered, but an inextricable aspect of the activity of being human. Meanwhile, in America, Thomas Jefferson "took his division of rights into alienable and unalienable from Hutcheson, who made the distinction popular and important",  and in the United States Declaration of Independence , famously condensed this to:.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights In the 19th century, the movement to abolish slavery seized this passage as a statement of constitutional principle, although the U. As a lawyer, future Chief Justice Salmon P. The law of the Creator, which invests every human being with an inalienable title to freedom, cannot be repealed by any interior law which asserts that man is property.
The concept of inalienable rights was criticized by Jeremy Bentham and Edmund Burke as groundless. Bentham and Burke claimed that rights arise from the actions of government, or evolve from tradition, and that neither of these can provide anything inalienable. Presaging the shift in thinking in the 19th century, Bentham famously dismissed the idea of natural rights as "nonsense on stilts".
By way of contrast to the views of Burke and Bentham, Patriot scholar and justice James Wilson criticized Burke's view as "tyranny". The signers of the Declaration of Independence deemed it a "self-evident truth" that all men "are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights".
In The Social Contract , Jean-Jacques Rousseau claims that the existence of inalienable rights is unnecessary for the existence of a constitution or a set of laws and rights. One criticism of natural rights theory is that one cannot draw norms from facts.
Moore , for example, said that ethical naturalism falls prey to the naturalistic fallacy. John Finnis , for example, contends that natural law and natural rights are derived from self-evident principles, not from speculative principles or from facts. There is also debate as to whether all rights are either natural or legal.
Fourth president of the United States James Madison , while representing Virginia in the House of Representatives, believed that there are rights, such as trial by jury , that are social rights , arising neither from natural law nor from positive law which are the basis of natural and legal rights respectively but from the social contract from which a government derives its authority.
Thomas Hobbes — included a discussion of natural rights in his moral and political philosophy. Hobbes' conception of natural rights extended from his conception of man in a "state of nature". Thus he argued that the essential natural human right was "to use his own power, as he will himself, for the preservation of his own Nature; that is to say, of his own Life; and consequently, of doing any thing, which in his own judgement, and Reason, he shall conceive to be the aptest means thereunto.
Hobbes sharply distinguished this natural "liberty", from natural "laws", described generally as "a precept, or general rule, found out by reason, by which a man is forbidden to do, that, which is destructive of his life, or taketh away the means of preserving his life; and to omit, that, by which he thinketh it may best be preserved.
In his natural state, according to Hobbes, man's life consisted entirely of liberties and not at all of laws — "It followeth, that in such a condition, every man has the right to every thing; even to one another's body.
And therefore, as long as this natural Right of every man to every thing endureth, there can be no security to any man This would lead inevitably to a situation known as the " war of all against all ", in which human beings kill, steal and enslave others in order to stay alive, and due to their natural lust for "Gain", "Safety" and "Reputation". Hobbes reasoned that this world of chaos created by unlimited rights was highly undesirable, since it would cause human life to be "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short".
As such, if humans wish to live peacefully they must give up most of their natural rights and create moral obligations in order to establish political and civil society. This is one of the earliest formulations of the theory of government known as the social contract. Hobbes objected to the attempt to derive rights from " natural law ," arguing that law "lex" and right "jus" though often confused, signify opposites, with law referring to obligations, while rights refer to the absence of obligations.
Since by our human nature, we seek to maximize our well being, rights are prior to law, natural or institutional, and people will not follow the laws of nature without first being subjected to a sovereign power, without which all ideas of right and wrong are meaningless — "Therefore before the names of Just and Unjust can have place, there must be some coercive Power, to compel men equally to the performance of their Covenants This marked an important departure from medieval natural law theories which gave precedence to obligations over rights.
John Locke — was another prominent Western philosopher who conceptualized rights as natural and inalienable.
Natural rights and legal rights
This chapter argues that the standard conception of Spinoza as a fellow-traveling mechanical philosopher and proto-scientific naturalist is misleading. Third, in the seventeenth-century debates over proper methods in the sciences, Spinoza sided with those who criticized the aspirations of the physico-mathematicians like Galileo, Huygens, Wallis, and Wren who thought the application of mathematics to nature was the way to make progress. In particular, he offers grounds for doubting their confidence in the significance of measurement as well as their piecemeal methodology. Keywords: Motion , common notions , philosophy of science , philosophy of mathematics , essence. Third, p.
Bertrand Arthur William Russell — was a British philosopher, logician, essayist and social critic best known for his work in mathematical logic and analytic philosophy. Together with G. Moore , Russell is generally recognized as one of the founders of modern analytic philosophy. His famous paradox , theory of types and work with A. Whitehead on Principia Mathematica invigorated the study of logic throughout the twentieth century Schilpp , xiii; Wilczek , In the public mind, he was famous as much for his evangelical atheism as for his contributions to technical philosophy. Generations of general readers have also benefited from his popular writings on a wide variety of topics in both the humanities and the natural sciences.
The Natural Law: A Study in Legal and Social History and Philosophy
Instead, it explores issues in contemporary metaphysics. Within metaphysics, there are two competing theories of Laws of Nature. On one account, the Regularity Theory, Laws of Nature are statements of the uniformities or regularities in the world; they are mere descriptions of the way the world is.
In philosophy , naturalism is the idea or belief that only natural laws and forces as opposed to supernatural or spiritual ones operate in the universe. Naturalism is not so much a special system as a point of view or tendency common to a number of philosophical and religious systems; not so much a well-defined set of positive and negative doctrines as an attitude or spirit pervading and influencing many doctrines. As the name implies, this tendency consists essentially in looking upon nature as the one original and fundamental source of all that exists, and in attempting to explain everything in terms of nature. Either the limits of nature are also the limits of existing reality, or at least the first cause, if its existence is found necessary , has nothing to do with the working of natural agencies. All events, therefore, find their adequate explanation within nature itself. But, as the terms nature and natural are themselves used in more than one sense, the term naturalism is also far from having one fixed meaning.
What is research? Depending on who you ask, you will likely get very different answers to this seemingly innocuous question. Some people will say that they routinely research different online websites to find the best place to buy goods or services they want. Television news channels supposedly conduct research in the form of viewer polls on topics of public interest such as forthcoming elections or government-funded projects. Undergraduate students research the Internet to find the information they need to complete assigned projects or term papers. Graduate students working on research projects for a professor may see research as collecting or analyzing data related to their project. Businesses and consultants research different potential solutions to remedy organizational problems such as a supply chain bottleneck or to identify customer purchase patterns.
Natural rights and legal rights are the two basic types of rights. Natural law first appeared in ancient Greek philosophy ,  and was referred to by Roman philosopher Cicero. It was subsequently alluded to in the Bible ,  and then developed in the Middle Ages by Catholic philosophers such as Albert the Great and his pupil Thomas Aquinas. During the Age of Enlightenment , the concept of natural laws was used to challenge the divine right of kings , and became an alternative justification for the establishment of a social contract , positive law , and government — and thus legal rights — in the form of classical republicanism. Conversely, the concept of natural rights is used by others to challenge the legitimacy of all such establishments.
- Гамма-лучи против электромагнитной пульсации. Распадающиеся материалы и нераспадающиеся. Есть целые числа, но есть и подсчет в процентах. Это полная каша.
То есть… как ты их вскрываешь. Сьюзан улыбнулась: - Уж ты-то мог бы это понять. Это все равно что изучать иностранный язык.
Халохот поднимался вверх с пистолетом в руке, прижимаясь вплотную к стене на тот случай, если Беккер попытается напасть на него сверху. Железные подсвечники, установленные на каждой площадке, стали бы хорошим оружием, если бы Беккер решил ими воспользоваться. Но если держать дистанцию, можно заметить его вовремя.
Как все это глупо, подумал он, быстро выпалил: - Я люблю тебя! - и повесил трубку. Он стоял у края тротуара, пропуская машины. Наверное, она подумает бог знает что: он всегда звонил ей, если обещал. Беккер зашагал по улице с четырехполосным движением и бульваром посередине. Туда и обратно, - мысленно повторял .
Формула называется Цифровая крепость, говорилось в заметке, и доступна для ознакомления в Интернете. Программист намеревался выставить ее на аукционе и отдать тому, кто больше всех заплатит. Далее в заметке сообщалось, что, хотя алгоритм вызвал громадный интерес в Японии, несколько американских производителей программного обеспечения, прослышавших о Цифровой крепости, считают эту информацию нелепой - чем-то вроде обещания превратить свинец в золото.