Judicial Activism And Protection Of Human Rights In India Pdf
File Name: judicial activism and protection of human rights in india .zip
Morin eds. Sythoff, Leyden, , pp. All Rights Reserved.
- Judicial Activism and Judicial Restraint
- Judicial activism to Public Interest Litigation
- Judicial activism
The author sets forth a picture of the different forms of judicial activism existing worldwide and how it led to the evolution of PILs in India.
Judicial activism , an approach to the exercise of judicial review , or a description of a particular judicial decision, in which a judge is generally considered more willing to decide constitutional issues and to invalidate legislative or executive actions. Although debates over the proper role of the judiciary date to the founding of the American republic, the phrase judicial activism appears to have been coined by the American historian Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr. Although the term is used quite frequently in describing a judicial decision or philosophy, its use can cause confusion, because it can bear several meanings, and even if speakers agree on which meaning is intended, they will frequently not agree on whether it correctly describes a given decision. Compare judicial restraint.
Judicial Activism and Judicial Restraint
Judicial activism is a judicial philosophy holding that the courts can and should go beyond the applicable law to consider broader societal implications of its decisions. It is sometimes used as an antonym of judicial restraint. The question of judicial activism is closely related to judicial interpretation , statutory interpretation , and separation of powers. Arthur Schlesinger Jr. The phrase has been controversial since its beginning. An article by Craig Green, "An Intellectual History of Judicial Activism," is critical of Schlesinger's use of the term; "Schlesinger's original introduction of judicial activism was doubly blurred: not only did he fail to explain what counts as activism, he also declined to say whether activism is good or bad.
The right to information is fundamental in environmental protection. Lack of access to information regarding environmental planning and licensing has often lead to public interest environmental litigation. The right to information is also an element in the formation of the rule of law in both its formal and substantive aspects. Mining must be cautionary conducted due to its high potential for environmental damage and pollution. This paper discusses the extent to which is the right to environmental information protected in Indonesia through several cases of mining litigation. Using statutory and court cases methods, it discusses laws on the rights to information in general and in the field of environmental protection, how Indonesian courts have interpreted the government obligations to fulfill citizens' access to mining information, and the extent to which that legal interpretation contributes to the rule of law elements. This paper then concludes that the right to mining information is still difficult to attain.
Judicial activism to Public Interest Litigation
I consider it a great honour and privilege to have been invited to deliver the Justice Krishna Rao Memorial Lecture for the year I have not had the pleasure of meeting Late Justice N. Krishna Rao, a distinguished Judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court personally but from many who knew him well I have learnt that he was a brilliant Judge with an equally brilliant academic record. He passed his B. After returning to India he worked as Sub-Collector for some time and then opted for the judiciary. He retired in
The author underscores that the patrimonial liberal Rule of Law ROL discourse usually disregards alternative traditions. First, it does not permit any reflection on the normative socialist ROL conceptions. Second, it disregards the very existence of other ROL traditions: for example, the pre-colonial, those shaped by the revolt against the Old Empire, or the non-mimetic contributions by the proud judiciaries in some "developing societies". In this context, the author analyses the distinctiveness of the Indian ROL and argues that it offers revisions of the liberal conceptions of rights. The author adds that the Indian ROL stands normatively not just as a sword against State domination, but also as a shield , empowering a "progressive" state intervention in civil society. Finally, the author introduces some current trends in the constitutional jurisprudence and highlights the leadership of the Supreme Court in the development of an extraordinary form of jurisdiction under the rubric of social action litigation.
Through judicial activism, the court moves beyond its normal role of a mere adjudicator of disputes and becomes a player in the system of the country, laying down.
However the efficacy of the mechanisms in place today has been questioned in the light of blatant human rights violations and disregard for basic human dignity in nearly all countries in one or more forms. In many cases, those who are to blame cannot be brought to book because of political considerations, power equations etc. When such violations are allowed to go unchecked, they often increase in frequency and intensity usually because perpetrators feel that they enjoy immunity from punishment. The rule of locus standi, i. Now court through public interest litigation permits public spirited persons to file a writ petition for the enforcement of rights of any other person or a class, if they are unable to invoke the jurisdiction of the Court due to poverty or any social and economic disability.
Judicial activism and Judicial restraint are the two terms used to describe the philosophy and motivation behind some judicial decision Judicial Activism and Judicial Restraint The Judiciary has been assigned active role under the constitution. Judicial activism and judicial restraint are facets of that uncourageous creativity and pragmatic wisdom. The concept of Judicial activism is thus the polar opposite of Judicial restraint. Judicial activism and Judicial restraint are the two terms used to describe the philosophy and motivation behind some judicial decision. At most level, judicial activism refers to a theory of judgment that takes into account the spirit of the law and the changing times, while judicial restraint relies on a strict interpretation of the law and the importance of legal precedent.
- Pelo rojo, azul, y bianco. Красно-бело-синие волосы. Мужчина засмеялся: - Que fea. Ничего себе зрелище.
Список необходимых покупок, любовные признания - все приходило к нему в зашифрованном виде. Это была игра, и со временем Дэвид стал неплохим шифровальщиком. А потом решил отплатить ей той же монетой. Он начал подписывать свои записки Любовь без воска, Дэвид. Таких посланий она получила больше двух десятков.