Gender Inequality Feminist Theories And Politics Pdf
File Name: gender inequality feminist theories and politics .zip
Feminist sociology is a conflict theory and theoretical perspective which observes gender in its relation to power, both at the level of face-to-face interaction and reflexivity within a social structure at large.
- Feminist Theories and Gender Inequalities: Headteachers, Staff, and Children
- Introduction: Gender and Politics: A Gendered World, a Gendered Discipline
- Gender Inequality: Feminist Theories and Politics
Feminist Theories and Gender Inequalities: Headteachers, Staff, and Children
This article discusses the gendered nature of politics as practice and political science as an academic discipline. It studies the sex-typing characteristic of most institutions in the modern world and describes how gender shapes the ways people organize, think, and know about the world.
The article then identifies the changes that have occurred in politics and political science over the last hundred years and examines the politics and gender scholarship.
Finally, it presents an understanding of the evolution of the gender and politics subfield as well as some of the challenges that remain. Keywords: gendered nature , politics , political science , sex typing , gender. Politics as a real-world phenomenon and political science as an academic discipline are gendered. This introduction and this volume aim to explain what this means and why it is important. People all over the world find that the basic conditions of their lives—their safety, health, education, work, as well as access to markets, public space, and free expression—are fundamentally shaped by their identification as belonging to particular sex or gender groups.
Individual bodies may be typed as male or female, masculine or feminine, heterosexual or homosexual, transgendered or nongendered in a dizzying variety of ways across cultures and over time. However, these social practices of gender often appear natural and unproblematic, even biological and therefore impossible to change, in the social contexts in which they occur. But a cursory review of the literature on the biological basis of sex, taking into account the wide variety of the number and content of gender categories across social contexts, reveals a world far more p.
Gender is never just about sex but varies by race, ethnicity, nation, class, and a variety of other dimensions of social life. Indeed, the persistent, dichotomous sex-typing characteristic of many institutions of the modern world would be a matter of intellectual curiosity if the consequences of being identified with a particular sex were not so dire. Across the globe, gender determines who goes hungry and who gets adequate nutrition and water, who can vote, run for office, marry, or have rights to children, who commands authority and respect and who is denigrated and dismissed, and who is most vulnerable to violence and abuse in their own homes and intimate relationships see, e.
These norms shape more than personal and family relationships or career paths, though they certainly shape those: they shape religious practice and the structure of markets and processes of governance Charrad ; Brettell and Sargeant ; Lamphere In the Philippines, income from domestic worker care work is the number one export and the largest source of foreign currency, while Lim estimates that income from sex work comprises between 2 and 11 percent of the gross domestic product of Thailand.
And, finally, since the global economic crisis has had a very differentiated impact in terms of the resulting spending cuts and austerity programs. It is clear that some groups are affected far more adversely than others, and many women—who make up a large proportion of state and public sector employees and the majority of single parents and the poor—have been particularly hard hit and affected in different ways from men Waylen Perhaps most profoundly, gender influences the very ways we organize and think about the world and our way of knowing about the world.
In such a context, it is hardly surprising that political science as a discipline is also gendered and fundamentally shaped by these social norms about sex and sexuality.
The canonical definitions of politics that have delineated the boundaries of the discipline have been read to exclude many of the topics covered in this handbook. As we will see, the study of politics has now broadened beyond the narrow focus on those holding formal office and the politics of distribution.
Yet, despite the vibrancy of the gender and politics scholarship shown in this handbook and a long history of gender activism, gender is still ignored in much academic political science. In doing so, it attempts a number of things. First, it challenges existing political science in terms of its concepts, subject matter, and even its methods. Second, it demonstrates the diversity of the gender and politics scholarship, embracing interdisciplinarity and a plurality of methods and approaches in ways that are unusual in political science.
And finally, it shows that much of the gender and politics scholarship has close links with the practice of politics, and feminism in particular, which again is unusual within most political science. As a result, although the categories of analysis overlap with other handbooks to some degree with chapters on institutions, social movements, interest groups, and multiculturalism , there are also categories such as sexual violence, reproductive rights, or sexuality and the body more generally not found or less salient in the other handbooks,.
More importantly, the organization of the chapters, and the priority given to these topics, is different from the handbooks that overlook gender. In this introduction, we map some of the changes that form the backdrop to this handbook, and we locate the gender and politics scholarship by delineating its relationship to the discipline of political science as it is conventionally understood and to politics as a practice.
We cannot do full justice to the complexity and sophistication of the wealth of gender and politics scholarship that now exists, as what we can present here is limited and inevitably involves some oversimplification.
But we argue that gender is centrally important to politics and that inequalities are embedded in both the study and practice of politics.
We also show that many scholars, influenced by feminism in its various different forms, see their work as challenging these inequalities and use standard methods and approaches as well as those that are more experimental or innovative. As such, we do not discuss the different chapters but give you instead some context within which to locate them and an understanding of the development of the gender and politics subfield. We end by outlining some of the challenges that remain before giving a very brief outline of the handbook.
For in-depth analyses of key concepts such as gender, intersectionality, reproductive rights, and ones more familiar to political scientists such as citizenship, the state, and representation—all central to the gender and politics scholarship—we direct readers to the individual chapters. Our starting point is to recognize the big changes that have taken place both in politics as practice and political science as a discipline over the last century.
Feminist activists and scholars have, of course, contextualized and questioned these patterns of male domination, pointing out that male domination is neither natural nor desirable. Anthropologists have documented the wide variety of family forms and modes of social organization around the world, defying any effort to theorize a universal public—private split or form of male dominance Lamphere For example, in Indonesia, trading in the market was seen as the domain of women Brenner Research similarly shows the bankruptcy of the notion of the supposedly universal patriarchal family form.
Historical and current family forms range widely from polyandry one wife, many husbands to polygyny one husband, many wives and includes matrifocal and matrilineal structures where inheritance and kinship structures pass through women Menon None of these modes of organization necessarily preclude male dominance, but they caution us against universalizing stories of public and private and common gender roles.
So the idea that the world was characterized by a uniform, patriarchal structure until the s does not comport with the anthropological or historical record Brettell and Sargeant ; Jolly and Macintyre Nor is it correct to see feminism as a Western invention or recent idea.
Women have organized to demand their rights in virtually every country in the world, though with varying degrees of success Htun and Weldon Feminist activists have used a wide array of tactics, from street theater to petitions and lobbying, to demand these rights.
The numbers of women who are prominent politicians and heads of state and international bodies in Europe, Africa, and Latin America have increased. Since , more than 30 national leaders have been women.
In this decade alone, Hillary Clinton has been the U. And in November , the lower houses of government in Rwanda and Andorra were composed of at least 50 percent women.
The discipline of political science has also been transformed. There are now more women involved in the academic study of politics. There have also been some very distinguished and influential women political scientists in the political scientist Elinor Ostrom became the first woman to win the Nobel prize for economics. And the academy as a whole has recently made some concerted efforts to create more of a level playing field with regard to women. But both the world and the disciplines are still male dominated even today.
The global average for women in the lower house of legislatures was still only 20 percent in November , a figure that conceals some big variations ranging from an average of At the United Nations, only 6 of 37 under-secretary generals 16 percent were women.
And international business remains perhaps the most male-dominated of these spheres of power; women comprise only 1. On a day-to-day basis, women still struggle to improve the conditions of their lives. A woman dies in childbirth every minute, and 99 percent p. The revolution in academia is similarly unfinished, with only 22 percent of academic political scientists in United States and United Kingdom in and even fewer women at the highest ranks and the most prestigious research universities APSA Gender and politics scholars argue that the roots of this enduring male domination in both politics and the political science academy are complex and profound.
While important, it is not enough in itself. More significant change is needed both to politics as a practice and to political science as a discipline to make them gender equitable. To facilitate this, we need to understand what is it about politics as an academic discipline and politics as a practice and the ways the two interact that results in this overrepresentation of men and a profound gender blindness.
If we first think about the nature of politics and political science as an academic discipline, several interconnected factors jump out. For her, the structural position of women reproduces the androcentric biases of the discipline. This domination is reflected in the very narrow and ideological definitions of what counts as politics on which the Anglo-American disciplines have traditionally been based. Politics, narrowly construed, is the activity of government or governing.
Indeed, the word politics in the original Greek was used by Aristotle to connote those questions that pertained to the operation of the polis , the political community. The distinctive feature of politics is its public or general nature, the way it affects the community as a whole as distinct from private matters Arendt ; Wolin Politics is also seen as the study of power, and sometimes by extension the study of the powerful. The traditional focus on politics as the study of the machinery of government and electoral politics or on political elites and formal institutions rendered women and gender invisible in spite of their foundational importance for building the welfare state and for constructing postcolonial nations, for the conduct of war and terrorism, and for maintaining social and economic privilege more generally.
The roots of these core assumptions about what constitutes politics in p. The Anglo-American disciplines took up this widely accepted if mistaken view of the transcultural and transhistorical universality of the public—private split, namely, that citizens or heads of household for which one should read men were the ones who were active and who should be active in the public sphere.
This analytical exclusion of women from the public sphere created politics as a male sphere from which women were legitimately excluded as political subjects. In turn, at least when it came to women, the private sphere was seen as lying outside the political arena and therefore did not form part of the legitimate subject matter of the discipline.
The notion of a separation of the public and private spheres persists today. In many places, assumptions about women and men and their respective roles in the public and private spheres still affect issues, from who governs to who decides intimate matters such as sexuality and childbearing. It affects the ways economies are structured and economic value—seen as created in the productive public sphere and not in the reproductive private sphere—is calculated.
It also continues to affect what counts as politics and the political, still predominantly high politics in the public sphere; who is seen as a suitable person to be involved in politics; and what are appropriate issues—often narrowly defined—that exclude certain activities and actors and embody particular notions of masculinity and femininity.
These ideas have again affected what has been deemed suitable subject matter for the academic discipline of politics. Even though some of the conventional definitions of politics would seem to allow for the study of a broader range of phenomena, it was feminists who pushed for a definition of politics that encompassed the personal and the private. Indeed, a rallying cry for many feminists has been that the personal is the political.
The powerful whether bureaucratically, economically, or socially powerful depend on the everyday, regularized activities of others to make their decisions or nondecisions realities. And p. So feminists brought the personal and the private into the study of the political, and they have also drawn attention to the politics of knowledge production and structures of production and reproduction more generally , meaning, and identity.
Feminists have highlighted how the discipline has been gendered in its approach to the valuation of knowledge. Political scientists have often assumed researchers to be disembodied and objective. Feminists have called for greater epistemological sophistication and nuance, introducing political scientists to a range of epistemological approaches from pragmatism and postmodernism to standpoint epistemology and hermeneutics.
This diversity of approaches and methods is a strength of feminist scholarship and a model for the field. More generally, feminist methodology reveals how gender fundamentally structures science, shaping more than the choice of methods or tools or methodology approach to the use of such tools in that it determines the questions that scholars ask and the areas of inquiry Harding Feminists have also shown that seemingly neutral research tools produce different results when used by female social scientists or social scientists of color.
Survey respondents give different responses to interlocutors of different identities; participant observation produces different opportunities and results for men and women. Some feminist scholars have revealed how social power structures knowledge so that the way we define and value knowledge reinforces patterns of class, race, and gender inequality. The legacy of these assumptions—the artificial analytical separation of the public and private, the privileging of high politics, and the adoption of certain models of the individual researcher and the research process—remains a source of resistance to efforts to change the discipline and make it more inclusive and equitable.
And if we turn to politics as practice, we see that these underlying assumptions have also impacted how politics is practiced. Similarly, in many countries domestic violence has been considered something with which the police should not interfere, lying outside state jurisdiction in the realm of the private.
Introduction: Gender and Politics: A Gendered World, a Gendered Discipline
The connection feminists have made between the personal and the political is no less relevant in the twenty-first century than in the —s when it became the message of second-wave feminism. Such research might be about researchers, educators, leaders, or children, young people, and adult learners. This entry provides first an overview of feminist theories. Next, there is an overview of literature concerned with leadership for equality, diversity, and social justice. Skip to main content Skip to table of contents.
Edited by Jane L. Parpart, M. Patricia Connelly, and V. Eudine Barriteau. The views expressed are those of the author s and do not necessarily represent those of the International Development Research Centre. Mention of a proprietary name does not constitute endorsement of the product and is given only for information.
In Gender Inequality: Feminist Theories and Politics , Fifth Edition, internationally renowned feminist Judith Lorber examines thirteen evolving theories of gender inequality. It also documents feminism's ongoing political activism, and with an exploration of postmodern and third-wave trends, points toward its future. Request Examination Copy. Abby L. Ferber, Kimberly Holcomb, and Tre Wentling.
In Gender Inequality: Feminist Theories and Politics, Fifth Edition, internationally renowned feminist Judith Lorber examines thirteen evolving theories of gender.
Gender Inequality: Feminist Theories and Politics
Sourcebook of Family Theories and Methods pp Cite as. Where are the women? That short question, raised and put forward by feminist movements, has opened fresh perspectives on social and historical life. Clearly, women were not absent from traditional research on families, as they were from studies of politics and paid work. Unable to display preview.
Liberalism and feminism : gender equality in Carole Pateman and Martha Nussbaum. ISSN This article discusses the relationship between liberalism and feminism through the work of two feminist scholars, Carole Pateman and Martha Nussbaum. This is an important issue for feminism, and one in which the problems associated with public-private and nature-culture dichotomies, inherited from liberalism, are fundamental. In this regard, we will discuss Carole Pateman and Martha Nussbaum's positions on the matter.
This article discusses the gendered nature of politics as practice and political science as an academic discipline. It studies the sex-typing characteristic of most institutions in the modern world and describes how gender shapes the ways people organize, think, and know about the world. The article then identifies the changes that have occurred in politics and political science over the last hundred years and examines the politics and gender scholarship.
Edited by Georgina Waylen, Karen Celis, Johanna Kantola, and S. Laurel Weldon
Раздался сигнал, после которого надо было оставить сообщение. - Привет, это Дэвид. - Он замолчал, не зная, что сказать. Беккер терпеть не мог говорить с автоответчиком: только задумаешься, а тот уже отключился. - Прости, не мог позвонить раньше, - успел сказать .
Потому что Стратмор обошел систему Сквозь строй? - Фонтейн опустил глаза на компьютерную распечатку. - Да, - сказала. - Кроме того, ТРАНСТЕКСТ уже больше двадцати часов не может справиться с каким-то файлом. Фонтейн наморщил лоб. - Это по вашим данным. Мидж хотела возразить, но прикусила язык. И прижала ладонь к горлу.
Безопасность шифра не в том, что нельзя найти ключ, а в том, что у большинства людей для этого нет ни времени, ни необходимого оборудования. Стратмор покачал головой: - Это шифр совершенно иного рода.
Стратмор даже не повернулся. Он по-прежнему смотрел вниз, словно впав в транс и не отдавая себе отчета в происходящем. Сьюзан проследила за его взглядом, прижавшись к поручню.
Когда ее глаза привыкли к темноте, Сьюзан разглядела, что единственным источником слабого света в шифровалке был открытый люк, из которого исходило заметное красноватое сияние ламп, находившихся в подсобном помещении далеко внизу. Она начала двигаться в направлении люка. В воздухе ощущался едва уловимый запах озона.
Не знаю. Все зависит от того, что ударило в голову автору. - Он привлек внимание к тексту на экране. - Кто-нибудь может мне объяснить, что это .